Stablecoin Monthly Update - Jan 2025
Stablecoin supply are at all time highs again—up 57% year over year. $TRUMP launch helped add ~$6B of stablecoin supply to Solana. The GENIUS and STABLE bills from Congress.
Continuing the theme of stablecoins gaining mainstream momentum from our last stablecoin update, we’re excited to highlight two LATAM focused stablecoin players—El Dorado and Shield. We decided to highlight them because both companies focus on solving real pain points when it comes to money transmission while abstracting the most complex parts of crypto away from the users. More importantly, they showcase how crypto:
El Dorado is a consumer based payment app available in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela. In a nutshell, users can download an iOS or Android app to:
Because Latin American consumers rely on disparate apps (PayPal, Zelle, MercadoPago, Pix, Nequi, Wise to name a few) for their day-to-day lives, El Dorado, through stablecoins (and other tokens) can transfer funds between apps that don’t have native support for interoperability.
For example, a graphic designer in Venezuela who freelances for an American company gets paid via PayPal in USD. However, there are two issues:
So she connects PayPal to El Dorado and uses El Dorado to buy USDT using El Dorado’s P2P Marketplace. Now, with USDT, she can take her money and spend it wherever she wants to. For example:
Here is a live demo of how to swap Brazilian Real to USDT using the El Dorado app: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNKjtEd48Yc
Finally, I had the pleasure to meet El Dorado’s Co-founder and CMO, Alessandro Cecere last week, and he mentioned several fascinating anecdotes:
Shield, founded by MIT graduate Isaiah Udotong and Princeton graduates Emmanuel Udotong & Luis Carchi, demonstrates how stablecoins are upending B2B cross-border payments. After spending significant time in Argentina, Ecuador, and Colombia, the team observed that many Latin American users are already familiar with USDT and the Tron network out of necessity as these users live in countries with high inflation and use crypto as a way to escape currency devaluation.
Shield leverages this existing familiarity with stablecoins and offers a compliant B2B payment platform that combines the efficiency of stablecoins with rigorous KYC and KYB processes. This approach has allowed them to earn trust from businesses that might otherwise be hesitant to engage with crypto-based solutions.
Uses cases: Shield has become a crucial facilitator for US-LATAM trade flows. For example, some of their customers include local importers who are buying US agricultural products and selling to the LATAM markets. What sets Shield apart is they meet their customers where they’re at. Their US users prefer to receive funds in their banks, while LATAM users prefer to use USDT. Shield therefore allows the importer in LATAM to pay for the products using USDT, and on the other end, the American suppliers would receive USD (not crypto) in their banks. Shield handles all the complexities in-between.
Another example of a customer are LATAM importers sourcing goods from Asia (e.g. Hong Kong). Shield’s key advantage is allowing same-day settlement, compared to the traditional 2-3 business day wait time for international wire transfers. This often allows buyers to get their inventory faster and reduces inventory risk.
Most interestingly, USDT on the Tron network dominates with 70% of transaction volume on Shield, followed by USDC on Ethereum, and a small but growing portion on Solana. This distribution reflects both user preferences and the practical considerations of transaction costs, as Tron's low fees make it particularly attractive. This is similar to the findings in Artemis’s stablecoin report with Visa and Castle Island Ventures that USDT and Tron are highly preferred in emerging markets.
The U.S. Congress is finally moving toward clear regulation for stablecoins with two major legislative efforts:
Both bills aim to create a comprehensive framework for dollar-backed stablecoins, ensuring they are fully reserved, transparent, and integrated into the financial system while mitigating risks like illicit finance and systemic instability. The overarching goal is to provide regulatory clarity that fosters innovation while safeguarding consumers, addressing a long-standing (and frustrating) gap in U.S. crypto policy.
GENIUS Act
The GENIUS Act takes a tiered regulatory approach—stablecoin issuers with under $10 billion in circulation can remain under state regulation, while larger issuers must transition to federal oversight under the OCC or Federal Reserve. The bill also:
Additionally, it explicitly allows banks to issue stablecoins and hold reserves for issuers— this represents an enormous step forward as most banks have been hesitant to hold crypto assets (e.g., the now repealed SAB 121 required banks to record crypto holdings as liabilities).
STABLE Act
The STABLE Act takes a more centralized regulatory approach, placing nearly all stablecoin issuers under federal jurisdiction. This means the STABLE act likely ensures uniformity across all issuers and makes stablecoins simpler to regulate but at higher compliance costs to issuers, especially smaller and/or inexperienced issuers. The STABLE Act also introduces stronger consumer protection provisions, such as automatic redemption rights (requiring issuers to redeem stablecoins at face value within a set timeframe) and enhanced financial crime compliance measures. However, forcing all issuers into a federal regime could stifle innovation by placing smaller projects under the same regulatory burden as major financial institutions.
Subscribe to our newsletter and understand what’s happening on-chain.